strictBindCallApply
TypeScript 3.2 introduces a new --strictBindCallApply
compiler option (in the --strict
family of options) with which the bind
, call
, and apply
methods on function objects are strongly typed and strictly checked.
function foo(a: number, b: string): string {
return a + b;
}
let a = foo.apply(undefined, [10]); // error: too few argumnts
let b = foo.apply(undefined, [10, 20]); // error: 2nd argument is a number
let c = foo.apply(undefined, [10, "hello", 30]); // error: too many arguments
let d = foo.apply(undefined, [10, "hello"]); // okay! returns a string
This is achieved by introducing two new types, CallableFunction
and NewableFunction
, in lib.d.ts
. These types contain specialized generic method declarations for bind
, call
, and apply
for regular functions and constructor functions, respectively. The declarations use generic rest parameters (see #24897) to capture and reflect parameter lists in a strongly typed manner. In --strictBindCallApply
mode these declarations are used in place of the (very permissive) declarations provided by type Function
.
Caveats
Since the stricter checks may uncover previously unreported errors, this is a breaking change in --strict
mode.
Additionally, another caveat of this new functionality is that due to certain limitations, bind
, call
, and apply
can’t yet fully model generic functions or functions that have overloads.
When using these methods on a generic function, type parameters will be substituted with the empty object type ({}
), and when used on a function with overloads, only the last overload will ever be modeled.
Generic spread expressions in object literals
In TypeScript 3.2, object literals now allow generic spread expressions which now produce intersection types, similar to the Object.assign
function and JSX literals. For example:
function taggedObject<T, U extends string>(obj: T, tag: U) {
return { ...obj, tag }; // T & { tag: U }
}
let x = taggedObject({ x: 10, y: 20 }, "point"); // { x: number, y: number } & { tag: "point" }
Property assignments and non-generic spread expressions are merged to the greatest extent possible on either side of a generic spread expression. For example:
function foo1<T>(t: T, obj1: { a: string }, obj2: { b: string }) {
return { ...obj1, x: 1, ...t, ...obj2, y: 2 }; // { a: string, x: number } & T & { b: string, y: number }
}
Non-generic spread expressions continue to be processed as before: Call and construct signatures are stripped, only non-method properties are preserved, and for properties with the same name, the type of the rightmost property is used. This contrasts with intersection types which concatenate call and construct signatures, preserve all properties, and intersect the types of properties with the same name. Thus, spreads of the same types may produce different results when they are created through instantiation of generic types:
function spread<T, U>(t: T, u: U) {
return { ...t, ...u }; // T & U
}
declare let x: { a: string, b: number };
declare let y: { b: string, c: boolean };
let s1 = { ...x, ...y }; // { a: string, b: string, c: boolean }
let s2 = spread(x, y); // { a: string, b: number } & { b: string, c: boolean }
let b1 = s1.b; // string
let b2 = s2.b; // number & string
Generic object rest variables and parameters
TypeScript 3.2 also allows destructuring a rest binding from a generic variable. This is achieved by using the predefined Pick
and Exclude
helper types from lib.d.ts
, and using the generic type in question as well as the names of the other bindings in the destructuring pattern.
function excludeTag<T extends { tag: string }>(obj: T) {
let { tag, ...rest } = obj;
return rest; // Pick<T, Exclude<keyof T, "tag">>
}
const taggedPoint = { x: 10, y: 20, tag: "point" };
const point = excludeTag(taggedPoint); // { x: number, y: number }
BigInt
BigInts are part of an upcoming proposal in ECMAScript that allow us to model theoretically arbitrarily large integers.
TypeScript 3.2 brings type-checking for BigInts, as well as support for emitting BigInt literals when targeting esnext
.
BigInt support in TypeScript introduces a new primitive type called the bigint
(all lowercase).
You can get a bigint
by calling the BigInt()
function or by writing out a BigInt literal by adding an n
to the end of any integer numeric literal:
let foo: bigint = BigInt(100); // the BigInt function
let bar: bigint = 100n; // a BigInt literal
// *Slaps roof of fibonacci function*
// This bad boy returns ints that can get *so* big!
function fibonacci(n: bigint) {
let result = 1n;
for (let last = 0n, i = 0n; i < n; i++) {
const current = result;
result += last;
last = current;
}
return result;
}
fibonacci(10000n)
While you might imagine close interaction between number
and bigint
, the two are separate domains.
declare let foo: number;
declare let bar: bigint;
foo = bar; // error: Type 'bigint' is not assignable to type 'number'.
bar = foo; // error: Type 'number' is not assignable to type 'bigint'.
As specified in ECMAScript, mixing number
s and bigint
s in arithmetic operations is an error.
You’ll have to explicitly convert values to BigInt
s.
console.log(3.141592 * 10000n); // error
console.log(3145 * 10n); // error
console.log(BigInt(3145) * 10n); // okay!
Also important to note is that bigint
s produce a new string when using the typeof
operator: the string "bigint"
.
Thus, TypeScript correctly narrows using typeof
as you’d expect.
function whatKindOfNumberIsIt(x: number | bigint) {
if (typeof x === "bigint") {
console.log("'x' is a bigint!");
}
else {
console.log("'x' is a floating-point number");
}
}
We’d like to extend a huge thanks to Caleb Sander for all the work on this feature. We’re grateful for the contribution, and we’re sure our users are too!
Caveats
As we mentioned, BigInt support is only available for the esnext
target.
It may not be obvious, but because BigInts have different behavior for mathematical operators like +
, -
, *
, etc., providing functionality for older targets where the feature doesn’t exist (like es2017
and below) would involve rewriting each of these operations.
TypeScript would need to dispatch to the correct behavior depending on the type, and so every addition, string concatenation, multiplication, etc. would involve a function call.
For that reason, we have no immediate plans to provide downleveling support.
On the bright side, Node 11 and newer versions of Chrome already support this feature, so you’ll be able to use BigInts there when targeting esnext
.
Certain targets may include a polyfill or BigInt-like runtime object.
For those purposes you may want to add esnext.bigint
to the lib
setting in your compiler options.
Non-unit types as union discriminants
TypeScript 3.2 makes narrowing easier by relaxing rules for what it considers a discriminant property.
Common properties of unions are now considered discriminants as long as they contain some singleton type (e.g. a string literal, null
, or undefined
), and they contain no generics.
As a result, TypeScript 3.2 considers the error
property in the following example to be a discriminant, whereas before it wouldn’t since Error
isn’t a singleton type.
Thanks to this, narrowing works correctly in the body of the unwrap
function.
type Result<T> =
| { error: Error; data: null }
| { error: null; data: T };
function unwrap<T>(result: Result<T>) {
if (result.error) {
// Here 'error' is non-null
throw result.error;
}
// Now 'data' is non-null
return result.data;
}
tsconfig.json
inheritance via Node.js packages
TypeScript 3.2 now resolves tsconfig.json
s from node_modules
. When using a bare path for the "extends"
field in tsconfig.json
, TypeScript will dive into node_modules
packages for us.
{
"extends": "@my-team/tsconfig-base",
"include": ["./**/*"]
"compilerOptions": {
// Override certain options on a project-by-project basis.
"strictBindCallApply": false,
}
}
Here, TypeScript will climb up node_modules
folders looking for a @my-team/tsconfig-base
package. For each of those packages, TypeScript will first check whether package.json
contains a "tsconfig"
field, and if it does, TypeScript will try to load a configuration file from that field. If neither exists, TypeScript will try to read from a tsconfig.json
at the root. This is similar to the lookup process for .js
files in packages that Node uses, and the .d.ts
lookup process that TypeScript already uses.
This feature can be extremely useful for bigger organizations, or projects with lots of distributed dependencies.
The new --showConfig
flag
tsc
, the TypeScript compiler, supports a new flag called --showConfig
.
When running tsc --showConfig
, TypeScript will calculate the effective tsconfig.json
(after calculating options inherited from the extends
field) and print that out.
This can be useful for diagnosing configuration issues in general.
Object.defineProperty
declarations in JavaScript
When writing in JavaScript files (using allowJs
), TypeScript now recognizes declarations that use Object.defineProperty
.
This means you’ll get better completions, and stronger type-checking when enabling type-checking in JavaScript files (by turning on the checkJs
option or adding a // @ts-check
comment to the top of your file).
// @ts-check
let obj = {};
Object.defineProperty(obj, "x", { value: "hello", writable: false });
obj.x.toLowercase();
// ~~~~~~~~~~~
// error:
// Property 'toLowercase' does not exist on type 'string'.
// Did you mean 'toLowerCase'?
obj.x = "world";
// ~
// error:
// Cannot assign to 'x' because it is a read-only property.